About the Competition
UW Law sends a team to the Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition, the world’s largest advocacy competition, with over 700 participating law schools from 100 countries.
The competition involves a mock case in front of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) relating to issues such as human rights, the law of war, and asylum law. The problem also often features a timely topic, such as autonomous weapons systems in 2019-20 and a global pandemic in 2020-21. The Compromis is the springboard for the competition. Written by leading scholars of international law, the Compromis is a compilation of agreed upon facts about the dispute that is submitted for adjudication to the ICJ, the primary judicial organ of the United Nations.
After the Compromis is released, students begin researching and preparing arguments for both sides of the dispute, drafting and editing written pleadings, called "Memorials," and practicing oral presentations in front of a panel of judges/coaches drawn from the law school faculty and the local legal community. Each team prepares two written Memorials and two 45-minute oral presentations, one for each party to the dispute. Teams argue alternately as Applicant and Respondent against competing teams before a panel of judges, simulating a proceeding before the ICJ.
The International Finals are often judged by former international law judges, including past members of the ICJ.
For more information on Jessup, see the competition website.
The competition involves a mock case in front of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) relating to issues such as human rights, the law of war, and asylum law. The problem also often features a timely topic, such as autonomous weapons systems in 2019-20 and a global pandemic in 2020-21. The Compromis is the springboard for the competition. Written by leading scholars of international law, the Compromis is a compilation of agreed upon facts about the dispute that is submitted for adjudication to the ICJ, the primary judicial organ of the United Nations.
After the Compromis is released, students begin researching and preparing arguments for both sides of the dispute, drafting and editing written pleadings, called "Memorials," and practicing oral presentations in front of a panel of judges/coaches drawn from the law school faculty and the local legal community. Each team prepares two written Memorials and two 45-minute oral presentations, one for each party to the dispute. Teams argue alternately as Applicant and Respondent against competing teams before a panel of judges, simulating a proceeding before the ICJ.
The International Finals are often judged by former international law judges, including past members of the ICJ.
For more information on Jessup, see the competition website.
|
2018-19 Members
Seth Brickey (3L) Varsha Govindaraju (3L) Rebecca Sweeney (3L) Michael Suh (2L) Lulu Anderson (2L) David Wang (2L) |
2018-2019
The Jessup Team was a finalist at the Portland Regional Round for the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition in February 2019. Team members Lulu Anderson and Varsha Govindaraju argued the semi-final and final rounds to secure a team qualification for the International Rounds in Washington, D.C. in April 2020. Additionally, Lulu Anderson was awarded the Second Place Speaker award, Varsha Govindaraju was awarded the Third Place Speaker Award, and Becca Sweeney was awarded the Eighth Place Speaker Award. The team had the 8th Best Brief. |
2015-16 Members |
2016-17 Members |
2017-18 Members |
|
James Feldman (3L)
Dierdre Madsen (3L) Duffy Romnor (2L) Kevin Eggers (2L) Greg Porter (2L) |
Duffy Romnor (3L)
Kevin Eggers (3L) Greg Porter (3L) Reina Almon (2L) Nathan Frei (2L) |
Reina Almon (3L)
Nathan Frei (3L) Gavin Keene (3L) Seth Brickey (2L) Varsha Govindaraju (2L) Rebecca Sweeney (2L) |


